Hall v. Hall
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
Plaintiff, the former husband of Defendant, appeals from a district court order setting aside a default judgment and subsequent writ of garnishment that he obtained in a tort suit. We dismiss the appeal because the order of the district court was not a final order.
The governing statute is NMSA 1978, Section 39-3-2 (Repl.Pamp.1991), which reads:
Within thirty days from the entry of any final judgment or decision, any interlocutory order or decision which practically disposes of the merits of the action, or any final order after entry of judgment which affects substantial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Carrillo v. RostroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Rodriguez v. ConantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- SUNWEST BK. OF ALBUQUERQUE v. RoderiguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Albuquerque Productions Credit Ass'n v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Baca v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- Deerman v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Dona AnaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Gutierrez v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- HIGH BIDGE HINKLE JT. VENT. v. AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.