Legal Opinion

Adams v. Para-Chem Southern, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1998No. 18663PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, J.

{1} This is a personal injury action in which default judgment for a substantial sum was entered against Para-Chem Southern, Inc. (Defendant). Linda K. Adams (Plaintiff) appeals from an order vacating the default judgment. Plaintiff asserts that the trial court erred when it failed or refused to consider the conduct of the Defendant’s insurer in deciding whether the standard for relief under Rule 1-060(B)(1) NMRA 1998 had been met. Plaintiff also argues that the trial court erred in finding that the Defendant’s own conduct met the standard of Rule 1-060(B)(1). We reverse…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Memorial Hospital System v. Fisher Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Capco Acquisub, Inc. v. Greka Energy CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Kinder Morgan CO2 Co. v. State Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Cordova v. AlperFairfax County Circuit Court · 2004
  4. DeFillippo v. NeilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Reynolds Revocable Trust Agreement v. LandauNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API