Legal Opinion
Garbagni v. Metropolitan Investments, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 19, 1990No. Nos. 10570, 10705PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONNELLY, Judge.
These consolidated appeals involve the question of whether plaintiff (protestant) properly perfected appeals from a decision of the state engineer denying the protest of applicant’s petition to change the location and purpose of a water right. We affirm the orders dismissing the two appeals.
Metropolitan Investments, Inc. (applicant) filed an application seeking a permit from the state engineer to change the place and purpose of the use of shallow ground water in the Rio Grande Basin. Protestant, together with several other individuals, contested applicant’s request for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Excess Insurance v. BinghamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Angel Fire Corp. v. C. S. Cattle Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- James v. BrumlopNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- National Excess Ins. Co. v. BinghamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Mathieson v. HublerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- G & G SERVICES, INC. v. Agora Syndicate, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Crumpacker v. DeNaplesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Henning v. RoundsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Anthony Water & Sanitation District v. TurneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Hope Community Ditch Ass'n v. New Mexico State EngineerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.