Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1986No. B14-85-424-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (Bell) and Daniel P. Gordon (Gordon) both bring limited appeals from a judgment entered in an eminent domain proceeding. This action originated when Bell initiated proceedings to condemn two Gordon tracts. Following an award by the special commissioners, Bell took possession of the tracts. Gordon filed objections to the award, thereby converting the proceeding to a judicial action. Gordon then filed a motion to dismiss the action for want of jurisdiction, which motion was granted. A bench trial followed on the sole issue of damages…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Van Zandt v. Fort Worth PressTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. City of Austin v. TeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. First City Bank-Farmers Branch, Tex. v. GuexTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Knebel v. Capital National Bank in AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. Read, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  2. State v. GraciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. Read, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API