Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Seattle v. Hessell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1925No. 18950. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

Suit on a promissory note. Tbe facts can be summarized from tbe trial court’s findings, as follows: T.bat tbe appellant is a bank doing business in Seattle; that the Farmers State Bank, in 1920, and 1921, up to November 8 of the latter year, was doing business in Connell, Washington, on which date it failed; that on December 29, 1920, the respondents made a promissory note in the sum of $2,600, payable to the Farmers bank ninety days after date; that this note was indorsed by the Farmers bank and delivered to the appellant as re-discount paper; that the respondents delivered to the Farmers…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Quinn v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Easton v. LittooyWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Kraus v. DowellWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Masterson v. HaislettWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farmers' Nat. Bank v. Missouri Livestock Commission Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Koppler v. BuggeWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Pfeiffer v. HeyesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Sherrill v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. School District No. 17Montana Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API