Legal Opinion

Renard v. Clink

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1892PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from Charlevoix. (Ramsdell, J.) Bill to foreclose a mortgage. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The bill in this cause was filed to 'foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendant Alice A. Clink to one A. H. Van Dusen, and by him assigned to •complainant. The other defendants are subsequent purchasers with notice, after the mortgage became due. A foreclosure at law was attempted, a sale made, and a deed executed to complainant; but, owing to the fact that the assignment of the mortgage to complainant was not of record at the time of said attempted foreclosure, that proceeding proved ineffectual. After the complainant had obtained her deed on the foreclosure at law, and before the filing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Myer v. HartMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Martin v. HamlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Moynahan v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Blakeman v. BlakemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
  5. Hearst v. PujolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Reggio v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Rauen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Moore v. ShookIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Komraus Plumbing & Heating, Inc, v. Cadillac Sands Motel, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Moritz v. HorsmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API