Ortiz v. City of Philadelphia Office of the City Commissioners Voter Registration Division
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Angel Ortiz, Project Vote!, and Service Employees International Union (collectively “Ortiz”) brought suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania seeking to enjoin the City of Philadelphia (“City”) from implementing Pennsylvania’s non-voting purge law as viola-tive of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The district court denied Ortiz’s request for a permanent injunction and Ortiz appealed. We have jurisdiction over Ortiz’s appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Finding no merit to Ortiz’s legal arguments, we will affirm.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Angel Ortiz v. City Of Philadelphia Office Of The City Commissioners Voter Registration DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Hornfeld v. City of North Miami BeachDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
- (PC) Andrews v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Hash v. RallosDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (PS) Neher v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.