Legal Opinion

(PS) Neher v. Davis

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 21, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00482Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY NEHER, Case No. 2:25-cv-00482-DC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SCOTT DAVIS, et al., 15 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 2, 6) 16 17 Plaintiff Timothy Neher is representing himself in this action and seeks leave to 18 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915.1

(ECF No. 2.) For the 19 reasons that follow, the Court recommends Plaintiff’s IFP application be denied, and the 20 First Amended Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. 21 I. MOTION TO PROCEED IN…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API