Legal Opinion

(PC) Hash v. Rallos

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 30, 2022No. 2:20-cv-01272Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH, No. 2:20-cv-1272 TLN AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 T. RALLOS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. Procedural History 20 In screening the complaint, the undersigned recommended that the claims against 21 defendants Rallos, Phile,1 Allen, and Zamora in Claim One be severed from the original case and 22 opened as a separate civil action. ECF…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API