Curtis Investment Firm, Ltd. Partnership v. Schuch
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin
The plaintiff, Curtis Investment Firm, Ltd. Partnership (Curtis Investment), brought an action against the defendants, Robert and Susan Schuch, alleging failure to disclose a defective water supply line. The trial court entered judgment for Curtis Investment in the amount of $1,532.50, plus costs. On appeal, the Schuches claim that Curtis Investment waived any right to recovery under the Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (Act) (765 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 1998)) by failing to demand a disclosure report prior to closing. The Schuches also argue that the judgment was erroneous because…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Baker v. CowlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Blagg v. Illinois F.W.D. Truck & Equipment Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Woods v. PenceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Erickson v. Muskin Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Fletcher v. MarshallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bauer v. GiannisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Collins v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Grady v. SikorskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Messerly v. BoehmkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Muir v. MeranoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.