Legal Opinion

Muir v. Merano

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 30, 2008No. 5-06-0626PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Welch

This is an action brought under the Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (the Act) (765 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 2006)) to recover a $10,000 earnest money deposit paid by the plaintiffs, Curt Muir and Valorie Muir, to the defendant, Scott Merano, on a contract to purchase a house. “The purpose of the *** Act is to provide prospective [home] buyers with information about material defects [in the home] known to the seller ***.” Coughlin v. Gustafson, 332 Ill. App. 3d 406, 413 (2002). “A prospective buyer may choose to rely on this information in deciding whether and on what terms to purchase…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. PerryIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Town & Country Utilities, Inc. v. Illinois Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Provenzale v. ForisterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Curtis Investment Firm, Ltd. Partnership v. SchuchAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kalkman v. NedvedAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  2. Bouton v. BailieAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API