Legal Opinion

Grady v. Sikorski

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 18, 2004No. 1-03-2397PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gallagher

Plaintiff Maureen Grady appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of defendant Richard Sikorski. Because we find that the Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (765 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 1998)) (the Act) does not apply to a transaction in which the only structure on the property is an uninhabitable building, we affirm the judgment for defendant.

In June 2001, the parties entered into a contract under which Grady would purchase from Sikorski property at 2938 North Damen Avenue in Chicago. The lot included a two-story structure that Grady intended to demolish to make way for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Quad Cities Open, Inc. v. City of SilvisIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Washington Courte Condominium Association-Four v. WASHINGTON-GOLF CORPORATIONAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. In Re Andrea F.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Provenzale v. ForisterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Hirsch v. FeuerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Skarin Custom Homes, Inc. v. RossAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. Banco Popular North America v. GizynskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API