Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Workforce Safety & Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 2006No. 20050392PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Steven Thompson appeals from a judgment affirming an order issued by Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) denying him further benefits. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Thompson was employed as a window assembler. In September 2003, he was swinging a mallet during assembly of a window and felt a sudden pain in his right shoulder and arm. The pain subsided while Thompson was at rest but immediately reoccurred when Thompson returned to work., [¶ 3] Approximately one week after the initial injury, Thompson sought treatment for his shoulder and arm pain. He reported no prior problems.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Negaard-Cooley v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bjerklie v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bergum v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Swenson v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Von Ruden v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Huwe v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Shotbolt v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API