Legal Opinion

Huwe v. Workforce Safety & Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2008No. 20070067PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Gaylen Huwe appeals from a district court judgment affirming an order of Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) denying his reapplication for disability benefits. We reverse and remand to WSI for further consideration.

I

[¶ 2] Huwe suffered a serious work-related injury to his head, neck, back, jaw, and teeth while employed as a truck driver in December 1992. WSI accepted his claim and paid medical and disability benefits. In January 1995, Huwe accepted a position with the State of North Dakota as a motor carrier inspector, and his disability benefits were…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Swenson v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Barnes v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Elshaug v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Negaard-Cooley v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cedar Rapids Community School District and EMC Insurance Companies v. Christine PeaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. Bergum v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Bruder v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Shotbolt v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Curran v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API