Legal Opinion

Keyes v. First Nat. Bank

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided June 15, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIOTT, District Judge.

I have reviewed tbe record and briefs in tbe above-entitled matter and find tbe facts in this record undisputed. I find. no contention on tbe part of counsel as to any material facts in tbe record.

Plaintiff states its five separate causes of action as receiver of tbe First National Bank of Eureka, successor to tbe German Bank of Eureka, and against tbe First National Bank of Aberdeen, to recover $37,466.70, wbieb plaintiff alleges was paid to tbe defendant bank by tbe First National Bank of-*679Eureka and the German Bank of Eureka, which the former succeeded, in payment of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. Chemical National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. First Nat. Bank of BurlingameCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. Rankin v. City Nat. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Cherry v. City Nat. Bank of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Leonard v. State Exchange Bank of Elk CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Deitrick v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
  3. Brand v. FalveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Britt v. Lennar CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API