Legal Opinion

Leonard v. State Exchange Bank of Elk City

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 13, 1916No. 4628PublishedCited by 18 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cortera!, Judge. Action by William D. Leonard against the State Exchange Bank of Elk City. There was a judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

This was an action at law brought by Leonard, plaintiff in error, to recover from the State Exchange Bank of Elk City, Okl., a sum of money paid by him to the National Bank of Commerce in St. Louis because of certain notes alleged to have been signed by him and two others for the accommodation of the defendant bank. The parties waived a jury in writing, and agreed that the case should be tried to the court. The court made a finding of facts and rendered judgment thereon for defendant bank. This writ of error, sued out by plaintiff Leonard, challenges that judgment, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. First Nat. Bank of BurlingameCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Cherry v. City Nat. Bank of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Flower v. Commercial Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bradley v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Schneider v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Tennessee-Hermitage Nat. Bank v. HaganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Schaeffer v. SterlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Keyes v. First Nat. Bank of AberdeenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API