Mapusaga v. Red Lion Riverside Inn

DONALDSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission involving a claim for Worker’s Compensation benefits wherein the commission found the claimant, Helen Mapusaga, totally and permanently dis*844abled under the odd-lot doctrine.1 In so doing it apportioned the benefits paid to the claimant between the employer/surety and the Industrial Special Indemnity Fund (ISIF) in the ratio of 29% to 71%. The ISIF has appealed that decision raising a number of issues which are discussed below. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The factual and procedural history of…