Legal Opinion
Pascoe v. Payne
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 27, 1932No. Docket No. 396PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSON, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from the judgment following verdict for plaintiff, in the sum of $3,750, in an action for damages for personal injuries arising out of a collision which occurred July 11, 1930, at the intersection of N and Eighth Streets, in the city of Bakersfield. The complaint is in the usual form and the answer denies negligence on the part of defendants and alleges affirmatively contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff.
The defendants are father and son. Plaintiff sought to hold the elder Payne for imputed negligence. The complaint alleges, and the answer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Buelke v. LevenstadtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Bosse v. MaryeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Truitner v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Taylor v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Packer v. WagnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Phipps v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Sayles v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Milburn v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Brown v. RolandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Holland v. KodimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.