Legal Opinion

Brown v. Roland

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1940No. Civ. A. 4605PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiffs Fred V. Brown and B. E. Stewart are doing business under the firm name of Brown Motor Company as dealers in automobiles. The record shows that through one of their employees they allowed the defendant Robert Roland, described in the body of complaint as a minor, to drive a Mercury sedan automobile, constituting part of their stock, for the purpose of demonstrating it to his parents, the defendants Grace Roland and D. E. Roland, who, as he gave plaintiffs to understand, might be interested in buying it. Although young Roland is thus described as a minor, he is not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pascoe v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Hayden v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Davis v. Donohoe-Kelly Banking Co.California Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Kinchen v. HansbroughLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Bush v. OliverIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Hall v. OsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Monroe v. OwensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API