Legal Opinion

Prevost v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided March 8, 1988No. Civil No. 1984/195Published

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, District Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The question we decide herein is whether federal labor laws preempt application of the borrowed servant defense to the exclusive remedy provisions of the Virgin Islands Workmen’s Compensation statute. We conclude that they do not, and because no other facts are in dispute, this case must be dismissed.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The circumstances under which this matter comes back to us can be gleaned from Prevost v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp., 640 F. Supp. 1220 (D.V.I. 1986) (“Prevost I”), rev’d and remanded sub nom. Nieves v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp., 819 F.2d…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API