Cline v. Broy
Oregon Supreme Court
Error to Washington.—Assumpsit. Defendant in error is a physician, and brought suit against Cline for medicines and professional services. "Verdict in favor of plaintiff for $38. Motion for a new trial. Motion overruled. Judgment on the verdict.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C. J.
Plaintiff in error, it is said, was entitled to a new trial, for the reason that no bill of particulars was filed with the declaration, and because the jury adopted an illegal mode of ascertaining their verdict. The record shows that a bill of particulars was produced upon the trial, which the clerk testified was sent to him with the declaration, but which he omitted to mark “filed.” This omission by the clerk cannot prejudice the rights of the plaintiff. The defendant in a case of this kind is entitled to a continuance, if no bill of particulars is filed, but cannot exclude plaintiff’s *90eviden…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. Columbia Common PleasNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Robbins v. WindoverSupreme Court of Vermont · 1802
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Carson v. BrauerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Parmentier v. RansomOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Blanton v. Union Pacific RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.