Legal Opinion

Carter v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1989No. 17340PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

The question presented in this appeal is whether a criminal defendant must be advised, before pleading guilty to a felony, that a conviction could lead eventually to persistent violator status if the defendant commits one or more other subsequent felonies. We hold that such advice may be desirable, but it is not mandatory.

The issue is framed by the following facts. Upon his plea of guilty, Don Carter was convicted on two felony counts of issuing checks with insufficient funds. He later petitioned the district court for post-conviction relief, alleging that his plea had been…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. Monica Joyce CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Saadiq v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  5. State v. GinebraSupreme Court of Florida · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Retamoza v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. MillerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. WilkersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  5. State v. HuffmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API