Legal Opinion

State v. Huffman

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 2002No. 27729PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Thomas Earl Huffman appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to two counts of forgery. He contends that he should be allowed to withdraw the plea because he was not advised before the plea that his forgery sentences might be made to run consecutive to earlier-imposed sentences for unrelated crimes.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Huffman pleaded guilty to two counts of forgery pursuant to a plea agreement wherein the State agreed to recommend unified sentences of five years with two years determinate and to recommend that the sentences would be served…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. State v. ColyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. LavyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. CarrascoIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HerediaIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. StoneIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. SunseriIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. NathIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. Kerry S. ThomasIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API