Legal Opinion

Retamoza v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1994No. 20350PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of Victor Retamoza’s application for post-conviction relief. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

I. FACTS

In January 1988, Victor Retamoza entered a plea of guilty to a charge of first degree burglary, I.C. §§ 18-1401, 18-1402, 1 and was sentenced to a minimum of seven years and a maximum of fourteen years of confinement. He took no direct appeal. In August 1991, Retamoza filed an application for post-eonviction relief under I.C. § 19-4901, alleging that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea because his primary…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estrada v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Ray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Woodrow Grant v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Hughes v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Hasan Icanovic v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API