Retamoza v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of Victor Retamoza’s application for post-conviction relief. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
I. FACTS
In January 1988, Victor Retamoza entered a plea of guilty to a charge of first degree burglary, I.C. §§ 18-1401, 18-1402, 1 and was sentenced to a minimum of seven years and a maximum of fourteen years of confinement. He took no direct appeal. In August 1991, Retamoza filed an application for post-eonviction relief under I.C. § 19-4901, alleging that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea because his primary…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Estrada v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Ray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Woodrow Grant v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- Hughes v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- Hasan Icanovic v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.