Legal Opinion

Shamlian v. Wells

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1925No. Docket No. Sac. 3638PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

At all times involved herein the plaintiffs were the owners of a twenty-seven acre tract of producing vineyard land in the county of Tulare. On January 28, 1922, they brought this action against the defendants for the value of the use and possession of said land from February 10 to October 8, 1921. Judgment was rendered in their favor for the sum of $1,800.50. Notice of appeal was served • and filed on behalf of all of the defendants, but the appeal is not prosecuted by the defendants Charles Wells and Harry Faith. The appeal of the defendant C. L. Caine is therefore the only matter here for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Satterlee v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Bridges v. McAlisterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  5. Johnston v. FishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Nichols v. Arthur Murray, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Early v. OwensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API