Legal Opinion

Michael v. Mosquera-Lacy

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 14, 2007No. 34497-1-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

165 P.3d 43 (2007)

Mystie MICHAEL, Appellant,

v.

Betsy MOSQUERA-LACY, et al., Respondents.

No. 34497-1-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

August 14, 2007.

Lincoln Charles Beauregard, Law Offices of John R. Connelly, Jr., Tacoma, WA, for Appellant.

Christopher W. Tompkins, Betts Patterson & Mines PS, Seattle, WA, Jody Lee Campbell, Olympia, WA, for Respondents.

PENOYAR, J.

¶ 1 Mystie Michael appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment, dismissing her Consumer Protection Act (CPA)[1] claims against Bright Now! Dental (Bright Now) for her periodontist, Dr. Betsy Mosquera-Lacy, using…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michael v. Mosquera-LacyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Michael v. Mosquera-LacyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Brotherson v. Professional Basketball Club, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API