Legal Opinion

Michael v. Mosquera-Lacy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2009No. 80665-9PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

200 P.3d 695 (2009)

Mystie "Patsy" MICHAEL, Respondent,

v.

Dr. Betsy MOSQUERA-LACY, Defendant, and

Bright Now! Dental, Inc., a Washington corporation, Petitioner.

No. 80665-9.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued October 21, 2008.

Decided February 5, 2009.

Christopher W. Tompkins, Stacia R. Hofmann, Betts Patterson & Mines PS, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Lincoln Charles Beauregard, Connelly Law Offices, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

SANDERS, J.

¶ 1 Dr. Betsy Mosquera-Lacy, a periodontist employed by Bright Now! Dental, Inc., performed a bone grafting procedure on Mystie Michael using cow bone…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Panag v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Trujillo v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Bavand v. OneWest Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Shepard v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Ambach v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 2009

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API