Legal Opinion
Intalco Aluminum Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, and International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 21, 1969No. 22633PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge:
Petitioner seeks to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued February 21, 1968, holding that petitioner violated Section 8(a) (2) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act 1 by recognizing and entering into a contract with the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO (Machinists) at a time when it was a minority union. The union appears as intervenor. The Board in its answer requests that its order be enforced in full.
The petitioner employer, Intalco Aluminum Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, began…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Midtown Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Komatz Construction, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Cascade General, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Methodist Hospital v. New York State Labor Relations BoardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Cascade General, Petitioner-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.