Legal Opinion
Merrill v. Bishop
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided November 6, 1951No. 2480PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Blume, Justice.
The petition in this case filed on October 18, 1949 alleges and discloses the following facts: The defendant L. C. Bishop is the State Engineer for the State of Wyoming; the defendant Guy W. Higby is the Water Superintendent in Division No. 3 of the state; the defendant P. T. Strain acts as Water Commissioner of the state at Large; the defendant Jack Haynes is the acting Water Commissioner for District No. 5 of Division No. 3. By virtue of a Treaty of July 3, 1868 (15 Stat. 673) a tract of land in the then territory, but now State of Wyoming, was set aside and reserved…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Winters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
- Conrad Inv. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- McLean v. Farmers' High Line Canal & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Day v. ArmstrongWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
- Hurst v. DavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Merrill v. BishopWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
- Hunziker v. KnowltonWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Hunziker v. KnowltonWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.