Legal Opinion

Conrad Inv. Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1908No. 1,530PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Montana.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree entered in the United States Circuit Court for the District of Montana enjoining the defendant from obstructing the flow of a stream of water to the extent of interfering with the rights of the Indians on the Blackfeet Indian reservation. The controversy relates to the right to the flow of water in Birch creek, an unnavigable stream whose middle line forms the southern and southeastern boundary of a tract of land in the county of Teton, in the state and district of Montana, reserved by the United States government for the permanent home…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Du Bois v. KirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Winters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. AdairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. United States v. Walker River Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  4. Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  5. United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API