Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald L. ZINK, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 19, 1997No. 95-50534PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
Donald L. Zink appeals a $5.8 million restitution order imposed following his guilty plea conviction for making false statements in loan applications, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014. Zink contends that the district court erred by imposing such a large restitution order because he lacks the ability to pay such an amount. The government argues: 1) that Zink waived the right to appeal his restitution order in his plea agreement; 2) that Zink failed to object to the magnitude of the restitution order; and 3) that the district court did not commit plain error by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Robert BolingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Frank E. ReadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Jerry D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Norman H. KeithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. ManiganCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Vance Bridgeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Jacob De La FuenteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip SCHUMAN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- People v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.