Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip SCHUMAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 24, 1997No. 96-50528PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■PER CURIAM.
Phillip Schuman appeals his 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(B)(ii). Schuman contends that the district court erred by ruling that the assertion of a coercion and duress defense precludes an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. The government contends that Schuman waived his right to *817appeal in his plea agreement. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and because we agree with the government, we dismiss the appeal.
Schuman contends that he did not waive his right to appeal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Robert BolingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Lawrence BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Karl KellerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jomar Michlin, United States of America v. Rahsaan WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Robert LITTLEFIELD, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Pascual Dionicio JeronimoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco AGUILAR-MUNIZ, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. BlitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Ramon MARTINEZ, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.