Legal Opinion
United States v. Norman H. Keith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 5, 1985No. CA 84-1134PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
Norman H. Keith pleaded guilty to charges of assault with intent to commit rape (18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a), 1153) and burglary in the second degree (18 U.S.C. § 1153 and A.R.S. §§ 13-1507, 13-701, 13-801). The district court sentenced Keith to a total of twelve years in prison on both counts and ordered him to pay restitution to the victim in the total amount of $1560. The district court denied the portion of Keith’s motion for correction and reduction of sentence that sought deletion of the restitution order. - Keith appealed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- United States v. Clayton Fountain, Thomas E. Silverstein, and Randy K. GometzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Peter Arvanitis, Stanley Peters, John Yannakis, Perikles Panagiotaros, and Robert RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jerry D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Joseph PalmaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Ronald v. CloudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.