Persigehl v. Ridgebrook Investments Ltd. Partnership
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
In these consolidated appeals involving a certified question, a notice of related appeal (A14-0027), and a separate appeal (A14-0123), we consider whether Minn. Stat. § 504B.215 prohibits a landlord from billing tenants for fees in connection with a tenant’s utility bill; whether the statute imposes a requirement that those fees be equitable in comparison to the cost of the utility service itself; and whether the district court erred in dismissing an unjust-enrichment claim against the utility administrator who billed tenants for the fees. We conclude that the certified…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Timothy Hall, Jr. v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Ashcel Companies, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. County of DodgeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Huff v. Canterbury Park Holding CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023