Legal Opinion
Huff v. Canterbury Park Holding Corporation
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 22, 2023No. 0:22-cv-01922Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Danny Huff, Case No. 22-cv-1922 (WMW/ECW) Plaintiff, ORDER v. Canterbury Park Holding Corporation, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Danny Huff’s (Huff) motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, and Defendant Canterbury Park Holding Corporation’s (Canterbury) motion to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6). Huff opposes Canterbury’s motion to dismiss, and Canterbury opposes Huff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint. For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies Huff’s…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Charles Richard Stone v. Rick Harry Anita Schlank Deborah Konieska Rhonda Heskin Amy Anderson Lori Parkos Jim LindCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.