Legal Opinion

Rollow v. Frost & Saddler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 11, 1916No. 4974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Garvin County; R. C. Allen, Assigned Judge. Action by Frost & Saddler, a copartnership composed of N. B. Frost and another, against Robert Dyer and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant J. A. Rollow brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DUDLEY, C.'

This is an appeal from the district court of Garvin county. On April 28, 1909, the defendant in error Robert Dyer commenced an action in said court against the plaintiff in' error, Rollow, being case No. 331, to quiet title to 40 acres of land situated in said county, constituting his allotment,- by the cancellation of a deed executed by him and his wife to Rollow on January 29, 1909. In May following Rollow filed a general demurrer to Dyer’s petition. Following this, and on April 28, 1911, at a special term of said court, said cause was dismissed, at the cost of Dyer,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Wimberly v. WinstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Maas v. DunmyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. McAdams v. LathamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Harding v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harden v. District Court of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Woods v. Computer Sciences Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  3. Woods v. Computer Sciences Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API