Legal Opinion

Harden v. District Court of Tulsa County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 10, 1935No. Nos. 26333, 26334PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

This is an action by Andrew J. Harden (o prohibit the district court of Tulsa county from proceeding further in a certain cause wherein Elizabeth Harden is plaintiff, and Andrew J. Harden is defendant, and by consolidation, an action also by Elizabeth Harden to prohibit the district court of Pontotoc county from proceeding further in cause No. 13224, wherein E'iza-beth Harden is plaintiff, and Andrew J. Harden is defendant.

For convenience we will refer to Elizabeth Harden as plaintiff, and Andrew J. Harden as defendant, as they appeared in the various proceedings in the trial courts.

P'aintiff…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lumiansky v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Todd v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Looney v. County Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Harjo v. BlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Jackson v. HaneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bruce v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Southeastern, Inc. v. DotySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Kelly v. MaupinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Watson v. Gibson Capital, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  5. Shinn v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API