Legal Opinion
Wolfe v. Wallace
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1957No. Civ. No. 9172PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Plaintiffs have appealed from an order granting a motion by defendant A. R. Maede for a change of venue from Sonoma County to Lake County. Defendants Wallace and Eddings filed a demand for retention of the cause in Sonoma County.
The complaint alleges that the defendants entered upon plaintiffs’ land in Lake County and cut down and carried away 15 pine trees valued at $700; that the cutting destroyed the scenic value of the property and lowered its market value in the amount of $6,500; that the acts of the defendants were wrongful, malicious and wanton and contrary to section 733 of the Code…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ophir Silver Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Standard Brands of California v. BryceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Work v. Associated Almond GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Las Animas & San Joaquin Land Co. v. FatjoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Hardy v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stauffer Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Russell v. ManCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Russell v. Man CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020