Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Huysman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 29, 1994No. 93-CV-927PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALLAGHER, Senior Judge:
The District of Columbia (“the District”) appeals from a judgment of $240,000 in favor of the appellee, James Huysman, and a judgment of $20,000 for loss of consortium in favor of appellee’s wife and co-plaintiff, Betsy Huysman. The judgment arises from a collision involving appellee and a District employee. On appeal, the District argues that there was no evidence upon which a jury could find that appellant had the last clear chance to avoid the accident, and thus, the trial court should have granted the District’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- King v. KiddDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Arthur Young & Co. v. SutherlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Oxendine v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Felton v. WagnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Robinson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Holmes v. Amerex Rent-A-CarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Washington Metropolitan Washington Area Transit Authority v. YoungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Cameroon Whiteru v. WMATACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- JUVENALIS v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.