Holmes v. Amerex Rent-A-Car
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GALLAGHER, Senior Judge:
In this ease we answer the following two certified questions of law from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit: 1
Under District of Columbia law, may a plaintiff recover against a defendant who has negligently or recklessly destroyed or allowed to be destroyed evidence that would have assisted the plaintiff in pursuing a claim against a third party?
If a plaintiff may proceed under such a theory, what standard of proximate cause must he meet?
Certification of Question of Law, 113 F.3d 1285, No. 96-7182 (D.C.Cir.1997).
In response to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Williams v. BakerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Oliver v. Stimson Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
- Ortega v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Torres v. El Paso Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Hannah v. HeeterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- Mazloum v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.