Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Amerex Rent-A-Car

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1998No. 97-SP-943PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, Senior Judge:

In this ease we answer the following two certified questions of law from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit: 1

Under District of Columbia law, may a plaintiff recover against a defendant who has negligently or recklessly destroyed or allowed to be destroyed evidence that would have assisted the plaintiff in pursuing a claim against a third party?

If a plaintiff may proceed under such a theory, what standard of proximate cause must he meet?

Certification of Question of Law, 113 F.3d 1285, No. 96-7182 (D.C.Cir.1997).

In response to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Williams v. BakerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Oliver v. Stimson Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ortega v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Torres v. El Paso Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hannah v. HeeterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Mazloum v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API