Legal Opinion

Brown v. Chowning

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1916No. 7606PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Carter County; W. F. Freeman, Judge. A

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

EDAVARDS. C.

The plaintiff, brought an action in replevin against one S. M. Ratliff and the defendant in error in the name of John Doe, for the recovery of two mules, the action being based upon a special ownership predicated upon a promissory note secured by chattel mortgage upon said mules, made by the said Ratliff. The defendant Ratliff was never served with-summons, and made no appearance. The answer of the plaintiff- in error was a general denial. The case was tried to a jury, and the verdict was returned for the plaintiff, in the following form :

"We, the jury impaneled and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bank of Cherokee v. SnearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. D. M. Osborne & Co. v. CaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  3. Weaver v. KuchlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  4. Stem v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. McDonald v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Haltom v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. SWEETEN v. LAWSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
  4. Seran v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Byers v. BurtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API