Legal Opinion

Seran v. Rose

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 3, 1923No. 11328PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, G.

Defendant in error A. Rose, as plaintiff, sued B. P. Serán, plaintiff in error, as defendant, and the Das-comb-Daniels Lumber Company, defendant in error, as defendant, in the district court of Okfuskee county to foreclose mechanics’ lien on certain real estate in the town of Pa den, Okla. He sued on his written contract for a balance due' and for certain extras placed in the building by- mutual agreement of the parties, and alleged that .the lumber company had furnished material to him for the building and that the lumber, company had a lien for the same. .Sevan admitted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alberti v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Whitcomb v. OllerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Bagg v. ShoenfeltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Brown v. ChowningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. SardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. Newman v. KirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Britton v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Fuqua v. Tulsa Masonic Bldg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Duncan v. Vance Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API