Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fidel Enrique RUELAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 13, 1997No. 95-10441PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed September 80, 1996 and published at 96 F.3d 1324 (9th Cir.1996) is amended as follows:
The first sentence of the second full paragraph on the right hand side of page 1327 is deleted from the opinion. The deleted sentence reads: “Moreover, the terms ‘use’ and ‘carry’ are refinements of the more inclusive term ‘possession.’ ” ■
[Editor’s Note: Amendment incorporated for purposes of publication]
With the foregoing amendment, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Thompson voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc and Judges…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Robert BolingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jose Navarro-BotelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Walter Dale BroncheauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Isabel Rodriguez De VaronCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Pedro Velasco-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Maldonado, AKA ChinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. AveryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Raohl HurshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.