Legal Opinion

Long v. Citizens' Bank

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the first district and from an order refusing a new trial. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

BlacKbuRN, J.:

This is a suit brought on a certificate of deposit in the usual form, purporting to be a certificate of deposit of the Citizens’ Bank for $1,000, payable to Hal W. Watters, signed, “J. P. Barbour, Cashier,” dated July 21, 1890. The evidence tends to show that the plaintiff purchased said certificate for value before the same became due, and that she is an innocent holder thereof for value. That a few men, including the defendants Robison and Johnson, early in 1890, agreed to form and carry on a banking business in Ogden, TJtah. Some time during the summer they agreed among…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York & New Haven Railroad v. KetchumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  2. Rockford, Rock Island & St. Louis R. R. v. SageIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Western Screw & Manufacturing Co. v. CousleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Safety Deposit Life Insurance v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tanner v. Sinaloa Land & Fruit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Petuskey v. ClydeDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1964
  3. Petuskey v. ClydeDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API