Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Petuskey v. Clyde

District Court, D. Utah

Decided September 12, 1964No. Civ. C7-63Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRitter, District Judge

The Supreme Court of the United States now has made crystal clear that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States requires “as a basic constitutional standard” that “the seats in both houses of a bicameral state legislature must be apportioned on a population basis. Simply stated, an individual’s right to vote for state legislators is unconstitutionally impaired when its weight is in a substantial fashion diluted when compared with votes of citizens living in other parts of the State.”

The Court’s mandate is not expressed in precisely…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Parkinson v. WatsonUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Mead v. MetcalfUtah Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API