Legal Opinion

Doles v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2002No. 01-172PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

[T1] After entering a plea of guilty to conspiring to deliver a controlled substance, pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant took leave of the court's jurisdiction. Upon his apprehension approximately two years later, he was sentenced. Appellant seeks to have the conviction set aside claiming he was denied counsel until he first appeared in the district court; for the court's denial of his request to withdraw his plea; and for a sentence he claims was contrary to the original plea agreement. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¥ 21

1. Is the fact that appellant did not have counsel in the county…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Anderson v. BauerWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  5. King v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Major v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Van Haele v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. Patrick K. TourvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Baker v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Janssen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API