Legal Opinion

Van Haele v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2004No. 03-138PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

[¶ 1] This is an appeal from a judgment finding appellant Mark Quixote Van Haele guilty of aggravated assault and battery upon the district court’s acceptance of an unconditional plea of nolo contendere under a plea agreement. In addition, Van Haele seeks relief from the district court’s refusal to allow him to withdraw his plea at the sentencing hearing. Van Haele further asserts that the district court abused its discretion when it denied his earlier motion for continuance of trial on the aggravated assault and battery charge in -order to try it with a related charge also…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Maes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kiet Hoang Nguyen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Mellott v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Brian J. Noel v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Dobbins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API