Legal Opinion

Murray, N. v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 2018No. 1172 EDA 2016; 1302 EDA 2016PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY BENDER, P.J.E.:

Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, *1238 and Janssen Research & Development, LLC (collectively referred to herein as "Janssen"), 1 appeal and Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nicholas Murray, cross-appeals from the March 10, 2016 judgment entered in favor of Mr. Murray following a jury trial. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Mr. Murray, a resident of Maryland, filed this action against Janssen in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, asserting, inter alia , that he developed gynecomastia -a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. CIPOLLA v. ShaposkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Erie Insurance Exchange v. HeffernanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Beall v. Holloway-JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Franklin v. Mazda Motor Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hammons, P. v. Ethicon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Brown, J. v. Halpern, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. A.Y. v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Eric Jasinski, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Kia America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  5. In Re: Risperdal Litig., Appeal of: Saksek, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API