McCarrey v. Commissioner of Natural Resources
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FITZGERALD, Justice.
The single issue in this appeal is whether the State of Alaska is required to hold a hearing prior to the cancellation of a graz ing lease. 1 We hold that the adjudicatory-provisions of the Alaska Administrative Procedure Act 2 do not apply to the termination of grazing leases by the State Division of Lands. We conclude, however, that the agency was required to afford notice and a hearing before terminating a grazing lease in order to meet the minimum standards of due process. Even though state agencies in some matters are not subject to the provisions of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- K & L DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. MurkowskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Webster Groves Trust Co. v. SaxonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- City of North Pole v. ZabekAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Owsichek v. State, Guide Licensing & Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Honeywell, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
- North Slope Borough v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.