Legal Opinion
Bridges v. Alaska Housing Authority
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1959No. 16PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, Associate Justice.
The question for decision is whether the Alaska Housing Authority, in the exercise of its power of eminent domain, may use a declaration of taking.
On June 9, 1958, the Authority filed a complaint for the purpose of condemning certain real property of petitioner in connection with a slum clearance - and urban redevelopment program within the boundaries of what is designated as “Urban Renewal Project T. A. R-7’, in the City of Fairbanks, Alaska. ■ On the same day it also filed an instrument entitled “Declaration of Taking”, asserting that the right to take petitioner’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Botts v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Van Dyke v. Midnight Sun Mining & Ditch Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
- Northern Mining & Trading Co. v. Alaska Gold Recovery Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
3Cited by20 opinions
- University of Alaska v. National Aircraft Leasing, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Bridges v. Alaska Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Vogt v. WinbauerAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Laverty v. Alaska RR Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.